Human wagering behavior depends on opponents' faces. "Research in competitive games has exclusively focused on how opponent models are developed through previous outcomes and how peoples' decisions relate to normative predictions. Little is known about how rapid impressions of opponents operate and influence behavior in competitive economic situations, although such subjective impressions have been shown to influence cooperative decision-making. This study investigates whether an opponent's face influences players' wagering decisions in a zero-sum game with hidden information. Participants made risky choices in a simplified poker task while being presented opponents whose faces differentially correlated with subjective impressions of trust. Surprisingly, we find that threatening face information has little influence on wagering behavior, but faces relaying positive emotional characteristics impact peoples' decisions. Thus, people took significantly longer and made more mistakes against emotionally positive opponents. Differences in reaction times and percent correct were greatest around the optimal decision boundary, indicating that face information is predominantly used when making decisions during medium-value gambles. Mistakes against emotionally positive opponents resulted from increased folding rates, suggesting that participants may have believed that these opponents were betting with hands of greater value than other opponents. According to these results, the best "poker face" for bluffing may not be a neutral face, but rather a face that contains emotional correlates of trustworthiness. Moreover, it suggests that rapid impressions of an opponent play an important role in competitive games, especially when people have little or no experience with an opponent." Bonus figure from the full text: [caption id="attachment_17044" align="aligncenter" width="382" caption="Figure 2 Diagram of the display viewed by participants in this experiment, and expected values for each of the two possible decisions. (A) Participants played a simplified version of Texas Hold em poker and were provided information about their starting hand and the opponent who was betting. Based on this information, they were required to make call/fold decisions. If participants choose to fold, they are guaranteed to lose their blind (−100 chips), whereas if they choose to call, they have a chance to either win or lose the bet amount (5000 chips) that is based on the probability of their hand winning against a random opponent. Opponent faces were obtained from an online database. The right column of the figure shows one face identity for three different trustworthiness values. (B) Graph shows how the expected value for each decision changes across starting hands. The optimal decision would be the one that results in the greatest expected value. Therefore, participants should fold when the probability of their hand winning is below .49, and call if it is greater."]
[/caption]
Related content: Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Do aggressive people play violent computer games more aggressively?
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: World Cup Week: Choose wisely, rooting for the winning team DOES make you more manly.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Study proves hot baseball players more likely to pummel you with their balls.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ
!
