Happy New Year! For a limited time only, access all online articles for free.

Fear of a black president: Mississippi edition

Gene Expression
By Razib Khan
Nov 13, 2008 12:31 PMNov 5, 2019 9:33 AM
mississippiobama.jpg

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

The map to the left shows the counties which voted for Obama (blue) and McCain (red) in the 2008 election. The blue counties are part of the Black Belt, the area where blacks are a majority of the population because of the economic concentration of cotton culture during the 19th and 20th centuries. The McCain Belt, those counties where John McCain beat George W. Bush, is getting some press, but obviously it is interesting to wonder about areas where large black populations which increased turnout are likely masking the shift of the white vote for John McCain. I have already shown on a state-by-state basis where the white vote shifted toward the Democrats in 2008, and where it shifted toward the Republicans. Though the average white vote budged only a bit, there is important regional structure which is being masked by aggregating all this information. The political scientist Larry Bartels reaffirms my basic point:

However, there is a good deal of circumstantial evidence suggesting that racial resentment eroded Obama's support among white voters. His gains relative to Kerry were significantly smaller in states with large numbers of African-Americans--a pattern disguised in the overall vote totals by his strong support among African-Americans themselves. In the former Confederacy he gained only slightly over Kerry among white voters, despite making big gains in two key swing states, North Carolina and Virginia. The only states in the country in which he lost more than a point or two of white support were Louisiana, Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi.

You can see this in the exit polls. They rather straightforwardly illustrate that Obama won a smaller percentage of the white vote than Kerry in many states in the South. But I decided to look at it a different way: I plotted the percentage of whites in each county and their vote percentages for Barack Obama and John Kerry in Mississippi. This is more precise than an exit poll because votes are votes, and the Census counts everyone. So here is that chart:

As you can see, as the percentage of whites increases the proportion voting for the Democrat decreases. This is no surprise. In this part of the South the Republicans are the white party, and the Democrats are the black party. But look at the slopes: it is higher in 2008 than 2004. That means that the white vote for Obama was lower and the black vote for him higher. The "ends" of the line swiveled so that the slope tilted up. If I assume that this is modeled by a linear regression, the r-squared for 2008 is 0.93 and for 2004 it is 0.76. If I assume that this is a logistic curve the r-squared for 2008 is 0.90 and for 2004 is 0.81. The r-squared can be interpreted so that one can say that ~90% of the variation on a state wide level in voting for Democrats could be explained by the proportion who were white in the counties in 2008. In 2004 the equivalent value would be ~75-80%. Both of these values are high, but, it suggests that the exit polls are right, and racial polarization has increased over the 4 years. Whiteness is a nearly perfect proxy for the Republican presidential vote now, and blackness the Democratic vote. And these associations have increased between 2004 and 2008. But it isn't as if Mississippi is one homogeneous state with one culture. Among whites there are those who are basically in Appalachia, while others who live in the lowland South. So I decided to constrain the chart to counties with various intervals of the white %. Here is a chart of only the majority black counties:

Here are majority white counties:

And here are counties where 62% or more are white, which is the proportion in Mississippi which is white (so these are the whiter counties in the state):

It looks to me that what you're seeing are two things: 1) Increased black turnout in counties where many blacks weren't voting. I think the black turnout went up nationally by about 10% (that is, from 11% to 12% of the electorate), but there might be regional disparities in terms of where that 10% is coming from. 2) Some white people in mostly white counties switched from Democrats to Republicans. I assume in majority black counties you're pretty much as polarized as you can get; very few white Democrats and black Republicans. In the overwhelmingly white counties there's less polarization because the fact that there are few black people means that white Democrats aren't a member of the black party, at least locally. But it looks like the emergence of Obama changed things even in very white counties, where there is a discernible drop off in white support, with obviously far less compensation from the relatively small black minority turning out a higher rate. If you're wondering about what that one outlier on the chart which is far away from the trendlines, it's Alcorn county in Mississippi's far north. It's not a data entry error, that was my first thought.... Here's the raw data:

WhiteObamaKerry

Adams435955

Alcorn87.82761

Amite56.64442

Attala52.54238

Benton654853

Bolivar33.46764

Calhoun70.13535

Carroll65.23434

Chickasaw57.55049

Choctaw68.53533

Claiborne14.68582

Clarke65.53732

Clay42.55952

Coahoma25.37364

Copiah48.45343

Covington63.24138

Desoto78.83027

Forrest62.54338

Franklin63.23735

George90.11622

Greene72.52427

Grenada57.42441

Hancock90.421.229

Harrison71.836.636

Hinds32.47060

Holmes18.28276

Humphreys25.67164

Issaquena39.36153

Itawamba92.52129

Jackson74.73230

Jasper46.95551

Jeff Davis41.76151

Jefferson13.58781

Jones71.63028

Kemper37.96353

Lafayette72.34340

Lamar83.52119

Lauderdale57.74034

Lawrence67.73736

Leake County55.64440

Lee72.33433

Leflore28.26862

Lincoln68.93431

Lowndes54.65838

Madison60.64235

Marion66.23433

Marshall50.35959

Monroe68.44140

Montgomery53.84645

Neshoba64.22625

Newton65.23227

Noxubee29.17671

Okitbbeha58.25043

Panola51.45249

Pearl River86.31923

Perry76.32725

Pike49.35147

Pontotoc84.52323

Prentiss84.92832

Quitman306760

Rankin79.42320

Scott59.64337

Sharkey30.66850

Simpson64.63932

Smith75.82421

Stone79.52727

Sunflower27.17063

Tallahatchie395955

Tate68.43939

Tippah81.32733

Tishomingo95.42334

Tunica26.67669

Union842427

Walthall54.74439

Warren51.94941

Washington31.36759

Wayne61.53936

Webster78.12526

Wilkinson30.16964

Winston54.64553

Yalobusha60.24644

Yazoo44.15745

More From Discover
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2025 LabX Media Group