Ancient Americans Favored the ‘Paleo Diet’ and Mostly Dined on Mammoths

Learn why combining biomarker analysis in human bones with hunting and butchering tools found at ancient campsites revealed Clovis people favored mammoth meat.

By Paul Smaglik
Dec 4, 2024 7:00 PMDec 4, 2024 7:02 PM
A Mammoth Meal
An artist’s reconstruction of Clovis life 13,000 years ago shows the Anzick-1 infant with his mother consuming mammoth meat near a hearth. Another individual crafts tools, including dart projectile points and atlatls. A mammoth butchery area is visible nearby. The scene is inspired by the La Prele mammoth site in Wyoming and set against the Montana landscape where the Anzick burial was discovered. (Credit: Artist Eric Carlson created the scene in collaboration with archaeologists Ben Potter (UAF) and Jim Chatters (McMaster University))

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

Although the contemporary Paleo Diet is trendy, there’s long been anthropological debate about what early man actually ate. Mostly fruit and berries, gathered from foraging? Small game? Or massive mammals?

“That’s been quite a controversy in the last decade or so,” says James Chatters of McMaster University. Chatters and colleagues have attempted to end this debate with a report in Science Advances that says North American people 13,000 years ago dined primarily on large mammals — with mammoth meat as their primary food source.

The report has implications beyond just food choice. What the Clovis people (named for their use of a particular kind of spear head) dined on says much about how they organized their lives.

Paleo Diet Debate Ended?

If the always mobile mammoths were the Clovis peoples’ primary food source, they would need to follow the beasts as they lumbered from one part of North America to another. Archeological evidence has already suggested that the Clovis people lived a nomadic existence.

They left evidence of a series of campsites, scattered in unpredictable patterns. Physical belongings left behind tended to be minimal, emphasizing their need to travel light.

“They are not going to have a lot of baggage,” says Chatter. “They are not going to create things that take weeks or months to make.”


Read More: A 13,000-Year-Old Camp Site Reveals Hunting Patterns from Ancient Humans


Big Evidence for Big Game

The archeological record also leaned heavily toward big game hunting. The Clovis people left behind large spearpoints — which would be overkill for bagging small game. They also discarded heavy spear shafts made of bone or wood — again more consistent with big game than smaller targets. And the size and type of abandoned tools indicated they were likely used to butcher large animals.

But this evidence for big game as a primary food source for the Clovis people was all indirect. That has now changed. The research group conducted biomarker analysis on a mother’s bones. They found that about 40 percent of her diet came from mammoth, with elk a distant second, followed by bison. Small mammals evidently played a minor role in her diet.

The confirmation of mammoth as a staple wasn’t surprising, says Chatters — but the level of elk apparent in the diet was. Elk were relatively new arrivals in North America at the time. Chatters also stresses that the levels of each kind of animal in the woman’s diet may be on the lower side.

“In doing this analysis, when there was a decision point to use this number or that number, we always chose the number that was more conservative,” says Chatters.


Read More: Early Humans Didn't Follow A Diet, They Ate For Survival


Tracking Mammoths and Extinction

Establishing directly that large mammals — what the researcher call megafauna — were Clovis peoples’ primary food sources holds some important implications, says Ben Potter, a University of Alaska archeologist and co-author of the paper. Tracking the large mammals’ paths helps better understand the Cloves peoples’ migration pattern. They essentially said “follow the mammoth!” says Potter.

Tracking both humans and mammoths may better help explain the large, hairy tusked animals’ extinction. Warming may have restricted their habitat. That in turn made the beasts more susceptible to over-hunting. But no one can yet establish that either warming or hunting alone killed off the beasts. Those were likely two factors of a complex mix of many.


Article Sources

Our writers at Discovermagazine.com use peer-reviewed studies and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. Review the sources used below for this article:


Before joining Discover Magazine, Paul Smaglik spent over 20 years as a science journalist, specializing in U.S. life science policy and global scientific career issues. He began his career in newspapers, but switched to scientific magazines. His work has appeared in publications including Science News, Science, Nature, and Scientific American.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 LabX Media Group