Get This: Apparently George W. Bush Isn't a Creationist

The Intersection
By Chris Mooney
Dec 9, 2008 10:43 PMNov 5, 2019 10:25 AM

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

When our lame outgoing president suggested teaching intelligent design alongside evolution in science classes back in (I think) 2005, I like many was outraged. But Bush's recent comments in one of his outgoing legacy saving interviews put the issue in a somewhat different light:

MCFADDEN: Is it literally true, the Bible? BUSH: You know. Probably not ... No, I'm not a literalist, but I think you can learn a lot from it, but I do think that the New Testament, for example is ... has got ... You know, the important lesson is "God sent a son." MCFADDEN: So, you can read the Bible... BUSH: That God in the flesh, that mankind can understand there is a God who is full of grace and that nothing you can do to earn his love. His love is a gift and that in order to draw closer to God and in order to express your appreciation for that love is why you change your behavior. MCFADDEN: So, you can read the Bible and not take it literally. I mean you can -- it's not inconsistent to love the Bible and believe in evolution, say. BUSH: Yeah, I mean, I do. I mean, evolution is an interesting subject. I happen to believe that evolution doesn't fully explain the mystery of life and ... MCFADDEN: But do you believe in it? BUSH: That God created the world, I do, yeah. MCFADDEN: But what about ... BUSH: Well, I think you can have both. I think evolution can -- you're getting me way out of my lane here. I'm just a simple president. But it's, I think that God created the Earth, created the world; I think the creation of the world is so mysterious it requires something as large as an almighty, and I don't think it's incompatible with the scientific proof that there is evolution.

So Bush is not a "fundamentalist": He doesn't read the Bible literally, he doesn't believe evolution and religion are incompatible. None of this excuses his stance on the teaching of intelligent design--which, most assuredly, was political pandering. And I agree: He was, indeed, a "simple president." Still, when it comes to reconciling science and religion, Bush is apparently like much of America--he accepts both.

1 free article left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

1 free articleSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

More From Discover
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 LabX Media Group