We have completed maintenance on DiscoverMagazine.com and action may be required on your account. Learn More

Could Pandas Be an Evolutionary Mistake—or Proof of an Intelligent Designer?

They don’t seem to care for sex or proper nutrition, raising questions about whether the fittest have survived.

By Lizzie Buchen
Aug 5, 2008 5:00 AMNov 12, 2019 5:24 AM
Cute panda bear climbing tree in forest
(Credit:Hung Chung Chih/Shutterstock)

Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter for the latest science news
 

Click here to see the related story, "Are Efforts to Save the Panda a Giant Waste of Money?"

The recent death of Ling-Ling, the only giant panda owned by Japan, sent the world into mourning. Everything about these giant teddy bears—their squat, furry bodies, their sad black eyes, their especially vulnerable babies (often compared to sticks of butter)—makes them ridiculously, scientifically cute. This, along with their dire status as a species, makes them a powerful symbol for the conservation movement as a whole.

0 free articles left
Want More? Get unlimited access for as low as $1.99/month

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

0 free articlesSubscribe
Discover Magazine Logo
Want more?

Keep reading for as low as $1.99!

Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Register or Log In

Stay Curious

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and unlock one more article for free.

 

View our Privacy Policy


Want more?
Keep reading for as low as $1.99!


Log In or Register

Already a subscriber?
Find my Subscription

More From Discover
Recommendations From Our Store
Shop Now
Stay Curious
Join
Our List

Sign up for our weekly science updates.

 
Subscribe
To The Magazine

Save up to 40% off the cover price when you subscribe to Discover magazine.

Copyright © 2024 Kalmbach Media Co.