Donald Campbell of Cornell and his colleagues made a radar map of the moon’s poles that showed features as small as 400 feet across, a thousand times sharper than Clementine’s view. Only a few small spots showed an icelike radar signature. And when Campbell compared the map with photographs of the moon, most of those spots turned out to be in sunlight and thus would have been too warm to hold ice. Campbell thinks the signal came from rough surfaces inside the craters, which distort radar in a manner similar to ice. There are still some deep craters that neither Clementine nor the Arecibo telescope could get a good angle on, he says, but if Clementine had seen anything, we should have seen it, too. My feeling is that if there were any ice on the moon, there would be more than a puddle or two hiding in the corners.
The Clementine researchers, however, stand by their results—and they’re counting on another spacecraft, the Lunar Prospector, to settle the matter. Scheduled for launch in January, that probe will map the chemical composition of the moon from an orbit over the poles.


